As of writing, in 5th place: Nancy Binay: 5,436,011
votes! (8:53 PM)
Early on in this race, it looks as if the woman we all hated
will win a Senate seat much to our dismay. Soon, we will be scratching our
heads and crying “Anyare?” (“What happened?”) How is it possible that the very
person we all hated could likely win in this election?
As film director Maryo J. De Los Reyes said in an interview with
ABS-CBN’s “Ang Tipo Kong Kandidato”, Filipinos have a penchant for drama. As in
the soap operas we are hooked into every afternoon and on prime time, we tend to
sympathize with the underdog—the oppressed and maligned character, usually from
poor background and physical attributes. Over the years, election candidates and
their managers have learned to utilize this flaw in the Filipino psyche resulting
in a type of social engineering we see every election season.
Turn a candidate into an underdog and s/he will have the
sympathy vote s/he needs.
This is one trap most of us fell into early on in this
election season. After all, there is another flaw in the Filipino psyche
utilized by these candidates and their handlers—our penchant for criticism or (in
Filipino) “pamumuna, pamumulà”. And the demographic most guilty of this crime
against Nancy Binay during this election season are those belonging in classes
A, B, and C or those from the educated, tech-savvy upper and middle classes that make up 7% of our society. From the day
Binay announced her candidacy and campaign, this demographic was on the attack
both in mainstream broadcast media and in emerging yet powerful social media.
Facebook and Twitter were the main platforms of cyber bullies against her, most notably through the use of parody accounts @IamNancyBinay and
@DonyaAngelica (based on Angelica Santibañez, the famed and hated antagonist
from the soap opera “Marimar” in the 90s). These two parody accounts were basically
hook and sinker which baited us into the type of drama Binay’s handlers were
expecting—to draw and encourage a large, educated demographic to push Binay to
the ground. Some well known figures, such as comedian Vice Ganda, and even Liberal
Party senatorial candidate and former Akbayan partylist representative Risa
Hontiveros, joined the bandwagon—a step, I bet, she’d later regret.
As of writing, in 5th place, Nancy Binay: 7,874,404
votes! (10:18 PM)
Just one of the many racial slurs against Nancy Binay. |
The masses related a lot to Nancy’s father: from his
complexion, to his platform, down to his bearing and approach during campaign
season. Being a vice presidential candidate, the elder Binay did show he was
competent enough to do the bigger job by attending debates and granting
interviews. After all, he has bullets to spare from his experience as Makati
mayor. In the interest of expanding his political clout in preparation for 2016
Presidential Elections, VP Binay gambled that his strategy in 2010 would work
for her inexperienced daughter. Before she was picked, we virtually heard nothing of Nancy Binay. If not for her complexion, people wouldn't believe that
she’s related to the vice chief executive. This is the only characteristic
father and daughter share and in order to win, the former would let the latter ride
on his popularity and devise a strategy to win: to turn her daughter into an underdog
in order to get the sympathy vote she needs.
Risa and Senyora: Alter-egos? |
We never knew (and dared to inquire) who are these people
behind the parody accounts against Nancy Binay. It could be her handlers or
non-affiliated sympathizers Or maybe it was indeed created by some savvy tweep
disgruntled by Binay’s inclusion in the race. We will never know the truth
behind it. Only one truth remains—the more the upper and middle classes bullied
Nancy Binay, the more it endeared her to the lower classes. With every slur against her color and inexperience, it was a swipe against the lower
classes. By turning Nancy Binay into the enemy, you turned against someone who
is with the masses.
As of writing, in 5th place, Nancy Binay: 8,594,831
votes! (11:10 PM)
It was a mistake bullying Nancy Binay no matter how
legitimate our issues are against her. Now, with the inevitable about to
happen, we just have to accept the fact that our own actions helped put a
novice in public service. As of writing, there are sentiments in Twitter and Facebook about
continuing the smear campaign against her in Senate. It wouldn't help in anyway
as it would only solidify VP Binay and his family’s foothold in the presidency
in 2016. What is the least we could do?
There are two things we can do: one, we can hold her accountable
for her election promises by closely watching and criticizing her legislative work or we can
encourage and help her accomplish the gargantuan task that awaits her novice
hands. After all, she is an elected official and part of being in a democracy
is accepting the results of democratic exercise. If we turn her into the
senator we expect her to be, she could transform into the compelling legislator
we don’t expect her to be. TSS
Please follow my blog via Google Friend Connect or via its Facebook page: The Social Scientist
this is a good analysis why she won. a lot of people are wondering about it. check out rappler for news update http://www.uplb.edu.ph/index.php/what-s-new/671-rappler-creates-ripples-of-change-in-uplb
ReplyDeleteThanks. :) I'm glad UPLB is collaborating with big names in online journalism like Rappler.com. Kudos!
ReplyDelete