Exercising your right to vote is more than just an
obligation but a privilege. Not all democracies get to vote for national
leaders such as in countries with parliamentary form of government where the
ruling party or coalition gets to pick the head of state and/or head of
government. Others are just failed democracies with various factions fighting a
bitter civil war against each other.
We’re just lucky to have this kind of electoral privilege.
Hence, we shouldn’t waste it by being too lazy to think about the candidates we’re
going to write on our ballots come May 13. Let’s not take it for granted in
exchange for a temporary fill in our aching stomachs. Our vote will determine
if our aching stomachs will be filled for the next three to six years. Do we
want someone elect someone who can only temporarily fill our tummies? Moreover,
are these candidates responsible for filling our hungry tummies in the first
place? Think about it.
In Part One yesterday, I featured the first four candidates
in the list of my senatorial bets, mainly Aquino, Casiño, Cayetano, and
Escudero. These are relatively younger candidates. Let’s look into the the much
older and more experienced candidates in my list.
CHAIRMAN RICHARD GORDON
Gordon is basically from a political dynasty in Olongapo
City. I am surprised that after dissing former president Joseph Estrada over
his dismissal as Chairman of Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority, he’s in good
terms with him now—which I don’t appreciate at all (not a fan of the Estradas
here). But I am willing to look beyond these things and focus on his legislative
accomplishments when he was still senator.
He did a good job (and still doing a good job) lobbying
in favor of election automation thru his sponsorship of the Automated Elections
Act. He showed his commitment and desire to make tourism an important industry
in our economy through his authorship of the National Tourism Policy Act of
2009. And he did a service to World War II veterans for authoring and lobbying
the passage of the Veterans Pensions and Benefits Act of 2008.
I’ve listened to his radio program Aksyon Solusyon several
times and have grown to admire his vision for the Philippines. I also admire
his excellent record of management as current chairman of the Philippine Red
Cross. I voted for him as president in 2010 and I have enough reasons to vote
for his return to the Senate for another term.
MAYOR EDWARD HAGEDORN
Hagedorn is one of three senators in my wildcard picks,
meaning, I wasn’t really keen on voting for them until after much consideration
during these past few weeks. The reason for this is because I see Hagedorn more
as an executive than a legislative official. He could’ve ran for governor of
Palawan and won. Or he could have courted PNoy to appoint him as DILG or DENR
secretary, which is a highly unlike thing to do now. We need to put this guy in
national government! But how?
Looking at his track record of transforming Puerto Princesa
City into one of the cleanest cities and one of the most sought after eco-tourism
destinations in the country, I realized that maybe this guy can also translate
the same transformation to the entire country if elected senator. He’s an
executive official which makes him qualified to do legislative work being part
of the Sangguniang Panlungsod and all that. And with a platform of
environmental protection and sustainable development, who knows? Maybe we can
we have better chances of achieving the Millennium Development Goals by 2015 if
he’s elected.
RISA HONTIVEROS
Hontiveros should have been in the Senate as early as 2010.
But then again, you cannot remove the fact that majority of Filipinos are still
conservative Catholics and won’t vote for a character that openly locks horns
with the Catholic Church especially on the issue of the Reproductive Health
Law.
Hence, I encourage voters (i.e. Catholic voters) to look
beyond Hontiveros’ position on the RH Law and focus on her legislative work in
the House of Representatives especially on women and workers’ rights. Apart
from the RH Law, she is also one of the authors of the Cheaper Medicines Act
and the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program – Extension with Reforms or
CARPER Law. She has authored bills such as the Anti-Prostitution Bill, Gender
Balance Bill, and Students’ Rights and Welfare Bill.
Being from the socialist spectrum and with the type of
activism and fervor she has, I think she will make things colorful in the Senate.
She is the type of legislator the Senate and the country deserves to have
rather than fatty, faded action stars and former soldiers-turned-rebels.
SEN. LOREN LEGARDA
As much as she is branded as a political butterfly, Senator
Loren Legarda’s legislative work especially on issues of women’s rights, health
care, environment, and agriculture. Her portfolio is packed with laws such as
the Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act, Cheaper Medicines Law, Expanded
Senior Citizens Act, Climate Change Act, and the Magna Carta for Micro, Small,
and Medium Enterprises.
She has previously passed laws which gained her popularity
among women and environmentalists such as the Clean Air Act, Anti-Violence
Against Women and Children Act, Anti-Child Labor Act, and the Anti-Trafficking
in Persons Act. Despite her notoriety for being a political butterfly, I only
see such acts as strategies so she can continually serve and consistently
pursue an agenda which is beneficial to most Filipinos. No wonder, from 1998 up
to now, she still tops the surveys and gets the highest number of votes every
time she runs. Nobody can beat experience and accomplishment like that of hers.
On Part Three: Llasos, Pimentel, Poe, and Villanueva
Please follow me via Google Friend Connect or like my Facebook page: The Social Scientist.
“They say if you don't vote, you get the government you
deserve, and if you do, you never get the results you expected.”
― E.A. Bucchianeri, Brushstrokes
of a Gadfly
