EDITORIAL | Why I Refuse to join the Vhong Navarro fiasco

Haven't you had enough of this Vhong Navarro fiasco?

I know you've had enough, especially since both television and social media have been pestering us with various versions of this story since last weekend. I know the eerie, tiresome feeling of watching 24-hour news channels replaying and rehashing the same news throughout the day. That's why I stopped watching television this week and scrolled past the articles in Facebook and Twitter about this scandal. Why the hell do I need to catch up on the news when my coworkers themselves have become their own commentators, investigators, and judges in this case?

I made a conscious decision not to speak up about this fiasco. I am taking the initiative of censoring myself from making any comments in favor or against the parties involved in this mess. Not that I don't care about this issue; just like any other scandal in this country, this has implications on our culture, about how we view rape as a crime, and how we see the people involved in this kind of trouble. It also has implications on another issue that is already a given in our society: the use of connections and networks in the abuse of one's authority. Nevertheless, I refuse to elaborate on these implications anymore and will distance myself from further making statements for the following reasons:

1. THE CASE IS STILL UNDER INVESTIGATION

Apparently, media is the new justice system these days. Anyone can become Sherlock Holmes or Judge Judy with just information presented to us on-screen. However, I have not seen the merits of the evidences in this case. So why the hell would I jump to the conclusion that Vhong Navarro is a rapist, or that Deniece Cornejo is such a promiscuous lass? I don't even know these people personally other than what and how they've presented themselves on TV. While I could exercise skills in analysis by scrutinizing the information media has made available about this case, will my comments help improve the merits of this case, when I am neither trained in crime investigation or judicial procedures?

2. I AM NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION

If I comment in favor or against any of the parties in this scandal, will it bring about the truth? Will it bring forth justice for both sides or am I just being vindictive by trying to insist that one side is right and the other wrong? Will my action further inflame the situation or bring about humility, forgiveness, and reconciliation?

3. THERE ARE OTHER NATIONAL CONCERNS

Hey, all the annexes of the Bangsamoro Framework Agreement have been signed by both the government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front! Oh my God! A hate crime has just been committed against a gay Filipino in New York! Gee, frost has been killing the livelihood of local farmers in the Cordilleras for weeks now!

Thanks to it, we know less about other issues that we should actually care about and be part of as a solution. Well, it's not so bad to read about this mess on the newspaper or the Internet; after all, we are multitaskers. But you have to admit, even as we multitask, this issue takes more time and energy to focus on than other news out there. It really does take much of your attention away from other concerns we should care about.

4. IT WOULDN'T BRING OUT THE BEST IN ME

I've heard some people around me lately, saying, "She doesn't look and sound like a rape victim to me!" or "He's long been known for his philandering; no wonder, he was accused of rape." I've known these people as morally upright men and women, who I thought would make objective statements about this case and not based solely on news reports that don't really give us the complete picture. What can we make of these people making such hasty generalizations? Do you seriously want to be part of this gang?

5. IT'S A WASTE OF RESOURCES

Just as I said in #3, there are other problems this nation is facing: problems that need resources such as time, money, energy, and property in order to be solved. I don't think the big three networks are helping solve these other problems by giving more airtime to this fiasco, which (if not for the celebrity status of those involved) is actually more fitting in the blotter section of the news. In other countries, you won't even see this kind of news being reported in their prime time national newscast. I hope the networks can harness their resources to more pressing concerns so that people can act more positively about it, just like what happened when Typhoon Yolanda struck.

Let's be honest. My reasons won't be enough to deter you from dipping your hands to this mess. I am not expecting my words to stop you anyway. After all, you know better than me. Ask yourself: Are you going to be part of the Vhong Navarro fiasco or not? TSS